Wednesday

Classic Hawk

-

[ This is another golden thread that is both entertaining as well as informative. goldenhawk challenges the atheists at every turn.]


Why Islam is the fast growing religion

goldenhawk786, Posted: 07 January 2010 03:59 PM

Islam is the only way forward. This atheist way of thinking is not going to get us anywhere. Rather in the contrary, it has been detrimental to the world. If islam is such a bad religion, then why is it the fastest growing religion? Why is it that Islam is growing fast among western nations? If it is a “barbaric” religion then why are the western society from the commoner up to the professors converting? If the average lay person becomes Muslim, then it can be said to be attracting simple minded people. But when the “western thinkers” accept Islam then that shows that it can’t be absurd, but reasonable.


Gila Guerilla:

There are quite a few non-sequiturs in the OP, and some unsupported conclusions and assertions.

Islam is the only way forward.
To where or what? Why the only way?

This atheist way of thinking is not going to get us anywhere.
How do you know? Who are we? What is the atheist way of thinking?

Rather in the contrary, it [atheism] has been detrimental to the world.
In some ways yes, but so has capitalism, communism, Christianity, Judaism, Islam - you name it. With regard to Islam, it inspires some misguided adherents to kill others as these adherents see fit. Of course not all Muslims are barbaric. Will the less fundamentalist Muslims speak out against their more aggressive counterparts – in a bold and open way, so that murder in the name of their god will be seen as bad by all of the world? Will they speak out in one voice to oppose the ill treatment of women by some of their fellow Muslims? Or will they say quietly that they don’t condone things like that, but keep silent when it comes to actually making changes?

If Islam is such a bad religion, then why is it the fastest growing religion?
Who knows? I don’t - do you?

If it is a “barbaric” religion then why are the western society from the commoner up to the professors converting?
Who knows? I don’t - do you, (or are you just guessing)? It is not all barbaric to be sure, but its holy book contains texts which some interpret as permitting barbarism in the name of their god.

But when the “western thinkers” accept Islam then that shows that it can’t be absurd, but reasonable.It doesn’t follow that this makes it reasonable. Obviously some people are prepared to adopt it, but I don’t know why - do you?

This OP seems to claim that a lot of things are obvious. None of them are obvious, and to make such claims does seem simple minded.


Replying to Gila Guerilla:

1. When I said Islam is the only way forward, is because all other relgigions have tried to “sort” this world out and all have failed. It is the only way forward to global peace and prosperity.

2. Atheism has failed. Atheist rulers such as Stalin have failed. The world is not giving Islam a chance becuase it knows of its strict justice system hold everyone to account. So it will hold all world leaders to account for their eveil crimes, especially the USA who is responsible for the current climate. Islam does not consider any difference from the normal street person right up to the king. The muslim rulers have been placed by “western governments” for their own reasons to supress the muslim populations, thats why their is so much anti-west resentment in Muslim countries.But let’s not worry, it will be just a matter of time when true justice is established on this planet and only ISLAM can do this. That’s why the rest of the world is so worried. It wants to hide the crimes and thinks it can get away with it. That’s why Islam is the only way forward.

3. Muslims have ALWAYS spoke out against opression and tyranny and injustice regardless of where it is coming from. The reason why you are not aware of this is because of the baised media.

4. The reason why it’s the most fastest growning religion is because it’s the only solotuon to mankind’s problems.

5. Misinterpreting is the fault of the reader, not the author.

6. The reason why “western thinkers” are accpeting Islam is due to answer 2 and 4.

5. Read my opening statement again.

Hope that answers your questions.


-


@ Tilberian
Your comment:I’d be interested to hear an example of a “western thinker” who has embraced Islam.

My answer: Research and if your really stuck then let me know, I will help you.


-

Leaps:

Statements that start off by proclaiming that “X is the only way to do Y” pretty much turn me off to the rest of whatever is being said, unless the statement is preceded by “my opinion is…” or other qualifying phrase.

But if it can be proven that X is the ONLY way to Y? would that be sufficient?


GAD:

Why is Islam growing the fastest, 3 reasons:

1) people want to kill other people to get what they think they are owed in this world but don’t want to be called evil for it, Islam gives them that (Christianity doesn’t kill enough to be competitive anymore).

2) Backwards nations and people that believe in Islam are breeding faster then rats.

3) Islam is violent and spreading (see points 1 and 2 above) and many people are scared and go along to get along least they loose their heads


1. Provide me proof of this
2. Is the USA a backward nation ?
3. I think you have been watching to much of FOX NEWS !


W. Collins:

And let’s not forget how totally awesome it is to live in Muslim countries.

Believe it or not, you have more freedom in certain muslim countries than you do among certain western nations. If you want evidence then I will gladly provide it

The amount (or type) of adherents does not change whether or not Islam is a “bad” religion, however you define that, I would judge Islam by it’s affects it’s followers, societies, and the world, and it seems mainly negative to me

1. Check independant sources.
2. Islam has given solutions for the problems of mankind. Whether you are bothered to check them up with an open mind is up to you. By the way, true science is comaptible with Islam.
3. The Atomic Bomb. That’s what “dark side” of science can do for mankind.
4. The reason is seems negative to you is because you are reading anti-islam propoganda.

Hope that answers the questions


arbiter:

I’m with Oriana Fallaci when it comes to my opinion of Islam.

Why is Islam growing in strength Oriana? “They breed like rats!”

People have negative views about Islam due to the very bad media that extremly biased which is run by the Jews.

[ goodgraydrab says high birth rate among muslims are casuse of Islam's growth]

@goodgraydrab…have you taken then conversion factor into it? i mean among western nations. western people are converting to islam. its not just all about birth rates!

Leaps:

You said: But if it can be proven that X is the ONLY way to Y? would that be sufficient?

I now can not possibly take you, or anything you say, seriously. Ever.

Regards,
L.

well why dont you aks me to elaborate further instead of simply dissmissing my claim ?

Tilberian:

Don’t bother trying to patronize me. I’ll take your failure to provide an example as a withdrawal of the claim [about a “western thinker” who has embraced Islam]

Western Judges who converted to islam. Here is one example.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Niud2MHDXrc&feature=related

Maths Professor who converted to islam.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5P6iwgbey4&feature=related

The list goes on and on. I have provded you 2 proofs. This should be sufficient for the reasonable minded person. I see your failure to be aware of the wider picture proves my assumtion that your only watching programs like FOX NEWS. No Offence ! However since I did promise to help you do the the homework for you, below I have provided you evidence to your answer which you could have known have you bothered to do some research. The 2 videos you are about to see are western thinkers converting to islam. Dont expect FOX NEW and CNN do give you this information ! LOL

Remember mathmaticias and judeges are not your average joe on the street. Now go and do your homework like them ! LOL



eudemonia:

I think this discussion is probably coming to a close. Next thing you know we will be going through that numerology thing in the Koran again.

I think we all know what we are dealing with here now. Didn’t we just go through this science thing with Danny O and the Mormon thing? How many faiths can TRUE science be compatible with?

I would like to know what science that was that Mohammed used to get to heaven while riding that white horse. Hell, we need propulsion systems like that to get to Mars perhaps.

I am not talking on other faiths. I am talking abot Islam. YOU need to prove Islam is wrong. The burden of proof lies with you. Prove me your case and if you have any questions about Islam, then i will be happy to assistt. please ask a couple of questions at a time. i can answer if you give me 1000’s of questions. As for the riding a white horse, i think we need to tackle this topic systematically. No point in discussing the holy prophet Muhammad (S) if you dont even beleive in god is there? you should stick to the god disscusion and take it from there.

GAD:

1. Provide me proof of this
2. Is the USA a backward nation ?
3. I think you have been watching to much of FOX NEWS !

1. See human nature
2. See G.W Bush
3. See any credible news

stop beating around the bush and give me evidence on questions 1 and 2 otherwise I will assume your just playing games. As for the the “credible news” you are refereing to, can you just provide me one example please?


Leaps:

Hawk said: YOU need to prove Islam is wrong. The burden of proof lies with you.

*yawn* That tired old argument again? Come on.

Well isn’t that what justice is all about. Innocent until proven guilty? Or does that not apply to religious people ?

YOU need to prove the Invisible Pink Unicorn is not in my backyard right now. (It is.) YOU need to prove there is no teapot orbiting the heavens. (There is.) YOU need to prove that I have not been caressed by the noodly appendage of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. (I certainly have been.)

Tired. Old. Argument.

Goodbye.

Well I am not trying to impose my views on you. its usually the athiests with their arrogant attitude towards religion, try to prove to us that there is not god. you need to watch some of richard dawkin videos and you will see my point.


Tilberian: [says in reply to evidence of judges and scientists converting to Islam:]

Well done. And just what is this supposed to prove again?

Well if you really bothered checking up on our prevoius conversations where you wanted proof that “western thinkers” are converting to islam, you would not have said this silly question above.

-

well why is it that your hero richard dawkins tries to prove evolution and tries to force it down our throats? you should watch his videos and then you will see what i am talking about

-

Atheism has no aims. Atheism does not wish to solve the problems of the world. Atheism is simply a non-belief in any god.

SO you agree that athiesm is not the way forward because it cant solve the worlds problems. but i say islam can and has done if you look up true islamic history. not the fox news version.

I don’t want to give Islam a chance with me, because I don’t believe in any god. To be Islamic, I would have to start believing, which is impossible for me, because it makes no sense to me. Of one thing I am pretty certain, Islam will not get rid of atheism. Islam teaches that people can only come to believe willingly, and not by oppression. Islam will not be able to make everyone come into its folds. As such, if Islam is to solve the world’s problems, it will only be able to do so if it uses force. But Islam opposes the use of force.

Agreed. Fair point. There is no compulsion in Islam. However, Islam will dominate the world, not by force but by choice. people will wake up to the reality and want a better life to what they currently have IF they knew it exsist. Tjhats why so many educated thinkers from the west are converting to islam.

As an atheist, I will never try to force you to give up your religion - but I will speak against it if I find the opportunity. As an atheist, I’d love to solve the problems of the world, but I don’t think any kind of force is the ultimate answer. The problem as I see it is that religions want the world to see things their way. Is it true that if I don’t see things your way, you think: <>As i said, force is not the answer by no other religion or system has a justice system like Islam can provide. Also your claim thta religions want people to see it their way? well i can say the same thing about atheism.

Now’s your chance. Speak out against it now. Do it openly, loudly and directly; particularly towards any oppressive tyrannical and unjust Islamists, (not those nice peaceful one’s like yourself), and see what happens. If there is a bias in the media, please point us towards some other source of information where Islamists criticise their own people.

like i said before, i oppose all acts of opression, regardless of if its commited by a muslim or anyone else. hope thats made it clear to you. as for “islamists” critising their own people who do wrong, just watch muslim news channels like http://www.presstv.ir/ where it is speaking uot on the recent oppression by the yemen and saudi forces against the houthis fighters in yemen. western media is in silence about this because it doesnt want to upset the “oil business” from their saudi partners.

goldenhawk786: 4. The reason why it’s the most fastest growning religion is because it’s the only solotuon to mankind’s problems.

Prove it.

Look up early islamic history from independant sources and then come back to me and tell me i am lying.

goldenhawk786: 5. Misinterpreting is the fault of the reader, not the author.

Not always, but in the case of the Qur’an let us assume that it is the reader who is at fault and not the author. Now prove that they, (those “other” Muslims) are the ones misinterpreting, and not you.

Because islam does not condone violence. it is a very peaceful religion, despite what you have been told.

arbiter:

If a person is really dumb, can we fairly call the above reply by goldenhawk786 plagiarism?

is there anything wrong with copying a pasting so i dont have to re-write what i have said to you monkeys. thats your problem. you dont bother to read or understand what i am trying to say. its that arrogant attitude and twisted belief of yours which is causing this to behave and think like an animal

celebrate the fact that I do not live in a country filled with people like you

well there will come a time where you will live in a country filled with people like me. it’s just a mtter of time my monkey friend

Sorry buddy, I’m the type to rather die on my feet than live on my knees. You are the one that wants immortality, I just want freedom.

well then dying on your feet will have to do then. as for the “freedom” you speak of. what freedom is it you want? freedom from anyone telling you what to believe or what to do? or the other freedome you talk about. well that will soon become even more limited as the revised version of patriot act is released upon you. then we will talk about this freedom of yours in more detail. god willing

Tilberian:

So the fact some westerners have converted to Islam proves nothing. As I thought. If you say it does, you will have to admit that the links I posted to stories about Muslims leaving Islam prove the counterpoint.

Show me where “thinkers” of islam have converted like i have done for you. I have not given you the average joe but “thinking” western people. can you do the same ?

I have, not that it is even necessary. You have to show a significant proportion of a population doing something before you can even start to identify some trend. Two educated westerners is a fluke. In a population that must number in the tens of thousands, we would be surprised if didn’t see such an anomaly.

So how many links do i need to provide to show it is not a fluke? 10? 100? 1000?

i expected a better answer from a “thinking” atheist. so far i am deeply disspointed


bigredfutbol:

Well, Frank Ribery converted to Islam. So that’s something.

Other than that, though. I don’t think goldenhawk has much ammo to work with. When is he/she going to let us know why evolution is wrong? That should be really…entertaining.

i dont see anything entertaining about it. life is not a game. however if you really want evidence to show evolution is jst a myth, then please take some time to check out the website below as this topic is not about evolution vs god. just visit the website and show me one example where the author is talking rubbish. thats all

http://www.harunyahya.com/


Well, you lied—that website is very MUCH about “evolution versus god” unless you don’t believe that Allah has anything to do with Islam. Have YOU read your link?

All I “learned” is that Muslim creationists are just as stupid and disingenuous as Christian creationists. Not that I ever doubted it.

OMG !! I am going to put this post on my mantle peice and cherish it. the webite author is a muslim so its obvious he beleives in a god called allah.
by the way you can watch your hero richard dawkins, talk about that life may have been created by aliens. the ivdeo is only about 90 seconds long. he has made a right fool of himself.


http://tr1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/18787/

You really are as stupid as you pretend to be, aren’t you?

by the way you can watch your hero richard dawkins, talk about that life may have been created by aliens. the vdeo is only about 90 seconds long. he has made a right fool of himself.

http://tr1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/18787/

GAD:

When you hate some group and you want them gone, you don’t talk nice about them, you use dehumanizing language, unless you are killing them to save them (for god), in which case you apologize to them while torturing them to death.

@ gad, your more stupid than i thought. i wonder what the stupid limit is for athiests ?

-

@ gad, your more stupid than i thought. i wonder what the stupid limit is for athiests ?

by the way you can watch your hero richard dawkins, talk about that life may have been created by aliens. the vdeo is only about 90 seconds long. he has made a right fool of himself.

http://tr1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/18787/

And you are one of the most ignorant and lowly people I’ve seen in a long while, prefect for islam

@ gad. tell me something, are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today ? You make monkeys look intelligent !

[ more punch ups on all sides ]

Sometimes I actually pity the atheists. Well all i can say to you brainwashed monkeys is that we will have to wait until your rotting in your grave and then you will ewake up to reality.

-

Tilberian:

Everyone, do NOT go to his website. He’s only trying to drive hits. Insist he repost the relevant data here and provide the link only for attribution.

I guess your panicking now. I’m not even started yet. You claim to be open minded and dont beleive in censorship. This shows the true nature of atheists. You guys are even to scared to watch your hero Richard Dawkins making these absurd claims.

can zen:

BTW, what is a muslim who does not believe in Allah? Your ability to mangle meaning is astonishing, but despite that I would love to see your response godlenhock786.

Bob

godlenhock786.? I would rather be called goldylocks. i guess we can replace 3 little bears with 3 little monkeys

goodgraydrab

No, not panicking. Saddened and alarmed. Obviously, you are limited in your ability for objective, reasoned and educated thought, regardless of your religious beliefs. From many of the things you’ve said on this forum pertaining to religion, government and personal references, your presentation here epitomizes Dee’s greatest fears, and for us to adhere to our highly prized concept of Reason, we must now trust and defend that your example of the Muslim faith in western culture is indeed a small minority. I appreciate that you are trying to engage with others unlike yourself, at first thinking that perhaps you are trying to broaden your experience and understanding of diversity and tolerance in a free democratic society. I’ve concluded that this is not so. In my opinion you have not represented yourself and your Muslim faith well at all and indeed you are serving to support any prejudicial stereotypes against your religion, for which, don’t get me wrong, many of us will probably struggle against to apply. Perhaps Dee’s threshhold is just lower. I don’t know your age, origin of birth or education level, but my hope is that you will seek out the most intelligent, tolerant and secular-minded mentors of your faith to emulate and learn from. Peace.

Peace, but you don’t need to give me the lecture old man. Very flowery comment and I can flip this and say the same thing about you. Peace


sheba:

Goldenhawk786,


First I’d like you to tell me a little about yourself : it helps to know whether you are a “he” or “she” . If you are a she then it should be easier to convince you that Islam is not your friend. Either way though, I want to know if you are a Muslim now or is it that you are thinking of becoming one ?


Can you describe yourself ? (Gender, age, nationality ,race, occupation, school, country, city, and anything else you can think of )

Yes I am a muslim and I am male. I live in the UK. Is that sufficient? Can you tell me a little bit about yourself please ?


Okay, you are Muslim and male. Tell me : where did you first get your information about Islam ? Did you read about it , were you seduced to join and become a Muslim , had you been listening to Muslim speakers, did you decide to visit a mosque , did you decide Islam could be for you because certain Muslim friends or acquaintances were so positive about it ? Or what was it ?


I was born a Muslim. My information regarding Islam has come from varoius sources. Lectures, Books, Videos, Internet, Friends and family.



Are you here because you want to hear what we have to say about your religion , or are you here to convince us how great it is ? If you want to convince us, you are out of luck because this is a REASON forum. That’s why it attracts so many atheists, because they have rebelled against the nonsense and fantasy that they believe religion to be.


I am here to give you the TRUTH abot Islam and try to remove any misconceptions about Islam and also try to give you a better alternative to what you already have.



But never mind that for now . You didn’t say what age you are, or what Nationality or race. Those things matter because how you see Islam , or WANT to see Islam ,could have a lot to do with your ancestry, background, influence from relatives etc.


Despite what you make think or know, I see Islam from reason, Logic and the only solution for mankind.



If you haven’t yet read a book on Islam that is OBJECTIVE you really should. I can suggest some good books. And do give yourself a chance to understand both viewpoints ! Be fair to yourself and hear why these authors reject Islam. I can promise you , you will not be sorry you did that. But you WILL be sorry if you just let yourself get carried away by promises of glory make by those who don’t know the difference. You wonder how someone, a Muslim, can be so sold on that faith and talk so confidently and fervently about it and still not know the difference ? Well this is how : chances are he was raised in a family that told him Islam and Allah were the greatest things in life, that he must believe, he must study, he must devote himself ,he must live the religious lifestyle that comes with being a good Muslim. He has all that stuff whispered in his ears when he is still in a cradle; he grows up never questioning; he just assumes that’s the way life is ! By the time he’s an adult, he has been completely pickled in the salty brine of religious dogma. No, he doesn’t know the difference—, but YOU can, and you owe it to yourself to do everything you can to gain perspective on the matter. My promise to you is this : that once you have made that effort and gained enough knowledge to compare , you will never be the same again ; you will know for sure which direction to take.


I have read many books on Islam. Some from non-muslims, athiests etc…I want to understand it from your viewpoint, thats why i am here ! These “authors” who reject Islam as you put it, are like most people because they already have a pre-concieved idea about Islam and let their prejudice blind their reasoning. As for the rest of the paragraph, the flip side to the coin would be that i could have been rasied in any religion or even be raised as an athiest progammed to hate all religion.



There are many, many reasons why Islam can not function comfortably in the modern world . If that doesn’t bother you then you do not understand the severe contrasts between Islam and other societies today. If you don’t mind my generalizing for a second , I can just say the reason Islam is such a misfit is that other societies in this world are advanced compared to Islam. “Only way forward” ? You really must be a newcomer to the world of religion. Goldenhawk, Islam is behind; way behind, mentally , physically, spiritually—every way ! Islam, Goldenhawk, is the past ! The rest of the world has left the ideas that Islam still clings to , and it has elevated itself to the better heights of humanity . Islam never did get that far—they are still wallowing in old notions, and religious restrictions. Why in the world would you want to be part of something like that ???


Thats according to your opinion sheba. I wannt to talk about hard core facts and evidence. Your above paragraph is all YOUR OPINION. I can flip the coin and say the same thing about athiesm.



I will give of myself willingly and humbly to any regular Muslim who will listen, but I cannot accept radical Islam or Islamists who already hate me and people like me because I am an “unbeliever”. That radical aspect of Islam is toxic. Please don’t let yourself get intoxicated !


Vice versa.


We need to talk some-more . I have unselfish intentions, because I know I will do you more good than harm. You don’t understand now, but I am on your side.


Vice Versa. your the first person who is talking to me nicely unlike the other baboons here and you seem to be ok. I will carry on this conversation with you if it stays that way.

Seba i have replied to your questions. Now, would you give me kind and give me a bit about your background as I have. Thanks.


-

Tilberian:

I’m going to wet myself laughing. The only person on the site Fauxhawk can see eye-to-eye with is the rabid Muslim hater we have all been castigating for her bigoted views. I guess irrational haters think alike. Fascinating and hilarious.

@ Tilberian….have you wetted yourself yet? is this common? if it is, then you should get it checked out. i know you act like a monkey but come on dude, you need to control yourself until you can reach the bathroom.

eucaryote:

That’s cool! I am pleased to see us all go to hell by whatever route we choose. However, if you decide to blow yourself up, you’ll keep it to yourself, won’t you? Thanks, we all appreciate it.

i am amazed how stupid athiets can be

SkepticX:

Responsible, rational adult behavior often seems stupid to children though.

i agree. thats why i condier children to be athiests. LOL

hperk:

The only way Islam will lead to “peace and prosperity”, as I believe ‘Goldenhawk’ has said it, is if every single soul on Earth converts. This has been shouted from the caves of Afghanistan as well as bled from the pages of the Koran. Osama bin Laden himself proposed a similar course of action when he took credit for the 9/11 attacks on Al Jazeera Television.

well i dont agree with the above as islam beleives in becoming muslim by choice, not by compulsion. but even if i did, then i can apply this comment and say you would want the same if everyone became athiests.

The problem (here) with the Koran is that it doesn’t encourage peaceful conversion or respect any differences. It calls for those who do not believe to be cast out, ignored, or flat-out-not-out-of-context-plain-as-the-day eliminated; gruesomely. Prove me wrong.

TOTALY WRONG. Islam is the most preaceful faith and encourages co-existance. This shows your overall ignorance of the islamic faith and specially about the QURAN. If that was the case then there would have been no christian left in any arab and muslim lands. This clearly shows prejudince and that you are narrow minded person, have been injected with anti-islam poison.

Islam is going to end violently. Such is its nature. It will either win, or it will lose. Either way, its finale will require bloodshed. It is my sincere hope that it can either evolve, or do as little damage as possible before the candle is blown out.

Oh, i beleive it will win and eventually dominate the earth as, i beleive, people will flock to it when they finally open the eyes from the propganda and embrace it willfully.

-

hperk:

Alright, Goldenhawk. Here’s your list. These are either from references made in Sam Harris’ The End of Faith, or from my own copy of the Koran, called the Koran Interpreted. Feel free to verify their validity by looking them up yourself. They are not out of context. I find their meanings to be clear.

“God’s curse be upon the infadels!” (2:89)

”(The unbelievers) shall be held up to shame in this world and sternly punished in the hereafter.” (2:114)

”(We) shall let them live awhile, and then drag them to the scourge of the Fire. Evil shall be their fate.” (2:126)

“Do not say that those slain in the cause of God are dead. They are alive, but you are not aware of them.” (2:154)

“The unbelievers are like beasts which, call out to them as one may, can hear nothing but a shout and cry. Deaf, dumb, and blind, they understand nothing.” (2:172)

“Slay them whenever you find them.” (2:190)

“Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God’s religion reigns supreme.” (2:191)

“The only true faith in God’s sight is Islam.” (3:19)

“Let the believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful.” (3:28)

“Say to the unbelievers: ‘You shall be overthrown and driven into Hell—an evil resting place!’” (3:12)

“We will put terror into the hearts of the unbelievers.” (3:150)

“We give them respite only so that they may commit more grievous sins.” (3:178)

“Think not the unbelievers able to frustrate God in the earth; their refuge is the Fire—an evil homecoming.” (K. Int., The Light 58)

“Fear the fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for unbelievers.” (K. Int., The Cow 15)

“We shall advance upon what work they have done, and make it a scattered dust.” (K. Int., Salvation 26)


I see several ideals that the Koran advocates in the above quotes; none of which include co-existence or harmony of any sort. Please note that these quotes were taken with careful consideration for context. These quotes indicate that the Koran:

1.) justifies and idolizes Islamic religious attacks.
2.) calls for violence against unbelievers (and Christians, pagans, and “crusaders”, as seen in the full text).
3.) makes the infliction of terror a goal for its followers.
4.) advocates the “casting out” of Christians and others with conflicting beliefs.
5.) demands that all beliefs other than Islam be eradicated.

Those are only a few of the reasons why Islam is a hostile religion. I didn’t even mention the restrictions on the rights of women, or the hoards of other lunacies proposed by the Koran. Most of the world has rejected Islam, likely because of its abrasive nature. About 33% of the planet is Christian. 22% are Muslim, followed by Hindus at 15% and “unbelievers” at 14%. The remainder is a mix of Buddhism and tribal beliefs. It is my understanding that, over the past ten years, atheism has grown by 7%, whereas Islam has been falling in rate. It rose from 2% to 6% shortly after 9/11, but studies show that percentages are declining. Atheism, however, continues to grow. In Australia, the numbers are astronomical; the United States is expected to follow. Europe’s religious connections have been dwindling for the past fifty years. It is atheism that is “on the rise”. Bad News Bears for you, buddy.


I am sorry to say this again, as this is getting embarrsaing for you, but you really are showing your ignorance and prejudice of islam.

The above quotes you have mentioned have been taken out of context. You have quoted only parts of the verse and not the whole verse. this may be due to your laziness to verify from the quran and just simply copying and pasting like a idiot from other anti-islam websites. Even some of the quotes are not correct! this clearly shows you could not be bothered to research yourself via an independant mind. as for yur last paragarph, i really dont know where to start on this, so the less said on this the better. i am totally shocked and saddened as i genuinly thought you would give me some logical reasoning, or “evidence” to support your case. sorry but you have failed in all areas, but i am not suprised. the other atheist give me better run for my money than you. next time you pose a question, research about it first. i bid you farewell. peace


-

goodgraydrab:

This childish banter is getting tiring and embarrassing. What are you ... 16, 17 years old tops? Jr in high school? Our 15 yo Atheist in just his few short posts has shown way more breadth and depth in his thought processes than you.

@ goodgraydrab….i wont reply to you becuase your just a brianwashed monkey. i guess you need more time to “evolve” before i can interllectualy debate with you.

-

Aaron, Administrator:

Hmmmm…..
Well, is this more in context?

2:190 Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors.

2:191 And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbeliever.

What a load of gibberish garbage. First all seems okay:
Only fight back against those who instigate.
Okay.
But then:
Kill disbelievers wherever you find them.
Also, banish them from where they banished you.
Whatever you do, don’t fight with them at the holy place, not unless they start it; then it’s okay to kill them. . . because disbelievers deserve to die.
Mixed messages anybody?

Don’t kill them, but kill them wherever you find them, but no in the holy place, unless they start it, then kill them because they deserve it anyway.

Is Allah confused, or just developmentally challenged?

Have you EVER, imean EVER bothered to ask ANY muslim scholar as to what the verse is talking about?

i honestly thought you athiest would at least research thoroughly before making these out of context statements. scooby doo has more sense than you guys. at least he investigates.


-

why cant you guys ask me proper questions? why do you keep on running away from the interlectuall battlefield ?

-

hperk:

That’s likely because we aren’t engaging in intellectual jihad; we just call bad ideas when we see them.

Besides—I think I’ve asked you quite a prime question: Why SHOULD anyone believe in Islam? It’s a topic on the Islam forum. I look forward to reading your answer.

WHY? have you not been reading me posts in this forum. i hgave so many reasons on to why islam is the only acceptable way of life. you shold read my post and any you disagree with, then feel free to ask. as for your bad ideas claim, show me one bad idea islam is preaching out.


eudemonia:

I have asked many appropriate questions.

Islam and science for example.

What propulsion system was used to propel Mohammed and his white horse into heaven?

Horses normally as far as we know, cannot fly. How did Mohammeds? Lets hear the theory and the engineering behind the deed.

Surely the Koran can and does explain the aerodynamics of a winged horse, no?

listen you silly billy, no where does allah mention in the quran about the holy prophet muhammad (S) going up in the sky flying on a winged horse. where did you get this stuff from? this shows you havnt read the quran and dont know anything about it. your just a parrot repeating like the rest of these idiots.

Aaron, Administrator:

The Bukhari Hadiths: In the year 621 at the age of 51, Muhammad flew on the magical Winged-Horse of Fire which he called Burak, which means “Thunder-Lightning”

hperk:

It doesn’t matter if he flew on a horse or a purple dragon; humans cannot fly. If, as it seems you suggest, the words of Allah allowed him this truly divine power, it still leaves us with blind faith as this argument’s only backing.

well they can fly by the help of god. you cant comprehend this fact due to the lack of your faith. but if richard dawkins says something, you will beleive it straight away. you follow science blindly, so dont you get me a lecture about blind faith.

As for taking the passage “metaphorically”:

This is far too often the lazy excuse that believers give to justify absolutely ridiculous ideas. Who decides what is to be taken literally and what is not? The answer is no one. There is not a soul alive that I think has spoken with God. If God did include fairy tales with moral lessons, I think it was a bad idea to shelve them alongside militant jihad and stoning adulterers. If we aren’t to believe that Mohammad flew away on a horse, we should not also believe that Jesus arose from the dead. One can’t cherry-pick from the “Word of God”, if one truly believes it to be.

nothing to do with being lazy. allah himself gives examples to make things clear. people best understand things with examples. if i was in a science class and the teacher just gave me a book to read, what are the chances of me being to understand? i think low.. but if the teacher gave me the book, and provided examples with it, i beleive the chances of understanding are high. some statements are clear in the quran, but some require examples and metphors. but even with all this explaining, people like you still dont understand.


Aaron:

What a load of gibberish garbage. First all seems okay:
Only fight back against those who instigate.
Okay.
But then:
Kill disbelievers wherever you find them.
Also, banish them from where they banished you.
Whatever you do, don’t fight with them at the holy place, not unless they start it; then it’s okay to kill them. . . because disbelievers deserve to die.
Mixed messages anybody?

why dont you take some time out and read the versus before and after those statements. if you still cant understand, why not read the commentry? if you still cant understand, then god help you.

Don’t kill them, but kill them wherever you find them, but no in the holy place, unless they start it, then kill them because they deserve it anyway.

Is Allah confused, or just developmentally challenged?

it is your primitive brain thats confused because maby you dont WANT to understand due to your prejudice. thats blinding you to the truth.

Have you EVER, imean EVER bothered to ask ANY muslim scholar as to what the verse is talking about?


Well, now, I think I just asked you, didn’t I? But then again, you’re no scholar. So, you simply cannot answer a question, I suppose. This is disappointing considering your very first post:

well if you read my last statement, i made it clear i wll answer IF i can ! you dont even read my posts carefully, let alone the quran !

You call that trying [ to answer questions]?

well why dont you ask proper question instead of going at a whim. i think you want to just pick and find faults, simply because of the “God” element involved and not due to facts or you really want to understand.

I’m sure that “proper questions” are the one’s you know how to answer. Claiming “improper question!” is an easy way to avoid responding “I don’t know,” instead drawing a typically condescending “god help you.”

like i said before, if i dont know then i will tell you. i am sure you dont know everything about athiesm. at least i am being honest. are you ?

eudemonia:

‘In the year 621, at the age of 51 years old, Mohammed flew on the magical Winged-Horse of Fire which he called Burak, which literally means White Horse but seen as “Thunder-Lightning”. The full version of this most memorable moment has been preserved in “The Bokhari” (Vol.15, p.3615) one of the Holy Islamic Scriptures’

So is this a lie? A vision? Is the vision a lie, or did Mohammed actually lie about having it?

this is a made up story. not true at all. that’s not in the quran. i beleive whats in the quran. cant you quote me from the quran? instead of bukhari which was written about 100 years after the holy prophet (S) martyrdom.


Rigamortus:

we predicted your move several turns ago, so… You decide

who is this we? you americans are to dumb to make any predictions, and even if you had half a brain cell to make a prediction, it will be way of the mark. just like your predictions on the war on terror (i take it as war on islam) have failed misrebly and will continue to do so in the future god willing.

If I took the quran or the bible, removed a bunch of it completely, kept some parts as meaningless poetry and ramblings to read on quiet nights, and rearranged the individual words of whatever is left to outline what I did on my last summer vacation, I suppose I’d believe in my interpretation too.

the quran are the words of allah, there is no doubt. there is no difference to the quran which was 1400 years old and the one we have today. it contains guidance for mankind. but guidance can be given to those who are only sincere and seeking, not to the stupid and ignorant.

W. Collins:

Show me some evidence of this great wisdom in the Quran please. Surely a book authored by a supernatural being must have some very incredible insights capable of turning atheists into believers. I know about flying ponies and stuff like that, but I want to see something realistic and mind blowing.

flying ponies in the quran ??!!! this is what i mean oh readers ! let me tell you a good story mr W. collins.

jesus (AS) is reported to have said the following statement…..

“i have been given many powers from god. i could cure the blind, cure the leapors, even raise the dead. but there is one thing i could not do.” so the people asked jesus what was that thing he could not do. you know what he said W.Collins? Jesus replied” I could not cure the stupid”. i think this story (if true) would fit you like a glove !


-

sheba:

This thread started out with you wanting to talk about Islam being “the fastest growing religion in the world ” , so I’d like to comment on that :

You are right - it IS the fastest growing in the world today, and it can only get faster . So why is it that way ? It’s easy- first Muslims reproduce so fast, and when a child is born into a Muslim family he automatically becomes a believer himself—so presto—you’ve got an assembly-line operation right there .

i agree that birth control is a contributing factor. the reason why muslim stay as muslim, is because there is no better alternative. i could understand if one was scared into rejecting islam in the middle east, but what about muslim born and bred in the west? surely they can leave if they wanted to. but if you ask them, they will most likely to inform you that its because islam has the answers to all of the problems mankind is facing.

So why do Muslims they have such big families and give birth so often ? I hope you aren’t shocked by this but Muslim women are walking talking incubators ; they have one baby after the other whether they like it or not. That’s because the good Muslim wife does NOT say “NO” to her husband when he wants to cozy-up between the sheets.

your talking rubbish here. i know so many muslim families that have only a couple of children. also the actual reason is that most muslim (like the catholics) are against birth control. and what about the western families? you telling me that some they dont have lots of kids? whats their reason for having lots of kids? the women cant say no to her husband ? dont say that they are isolated cases because they are not. you put up a crazy argument on this one.


Please don’t argue this, it even says that in the Koran. I’m not sure exactly how it went , but if I remember right it says that if a wife gets difficult that way “the angels will curse her ” He probably curses her too,- either that or he kicks her. Did you know, by the way, that in the cities and towns of the USA where they have “battered women’s “sanctuaries, that there are more Muslim women who come there than any other women ?

complete utter rubbish !!! nowhere does it say that in the quran. you really should for once in your lifetime actually take time and bother reading the holy quran instead of assuming which shows your ignorance and bias. show me one verse in the quran which supports you above case. for YOUR information and to all these brainwashed anti-islami idiots here in this forum, quran actually gave more freedom to the women before your “west” ever did. i can give you lots of examples but then this post be become to long. if you are honest and impartial then i suggest anyone reading this about women’s rights in islam to goto the following link.
http://www.islamfortoday.com/womensrightsbadawi.htm

try to study it carefully with an OPEN MIND as it’s not to long.


Then lets not forget the fact that men may marry more than one wife in Islam. They can also marry at a pathetic young age—whether they want to or not. All this means more and more babies . You may think this all sounds well and good, but you are not a woman. As a matter of fact, all this goodness and glory you see in Islam is partly due to the fact that you are a man. Ever carried a baby in your belly for 9 months and then taken care of it for years afterward ? Do that once and you will see the whole “fun” thing in a whole new way .I have a feeling Muslim men do not share the diaper-changing chore either .

men can marry more than one wife is islam, but there are strict conditions to it if you bother to read them. as i have mentioned so mant times on this forum that islam has the solution to ALL problems. lets talk about this problem you have mentioned. tell me, how would you solve the female problem in the USA? there are thousands (some reports say over a million) more women in the US than men. so let’s suppose if every man got married in the US to only 1 wife, there would still be lots of single women out there who cant get husbands. also i have not taken the male gay factor into account as you have a HUGE gay problem in the US. so what would be your solution to this problem? islam gives this allowance as some women dont mind sharing a husband and so men dont mind sharing a wife.

As I said the Muslim man thinks it is his “right ” not a privilege to diddle his wife , according to everything I’ve read and heard. In case you think you can prove otherwise by using yourself as a model , that doesn’t work because you probably are not experienced enough with women to know the difference. Or maybe your “advisers” in the mosques haven’t yet hit upon this subject .

what have you been hearing and reading woman ?!!! give me the name of just ONE book you have fully read from an islamic point of view. i dont want many, just one. i dont think you can. because you (and like most here) are just basing your “facts” on hearsay like you have admitted above. go and study carefully about islam and then come back and give me any of your so called facts.

you say i am not expenciened with women? i am married and have children and so are many of my friends to treat our women like princess. unlike you men, to beat up, treat women like sex objects, use and abuse them, are unfaithfull, fantaise about other women. dont even start here sheba, as i can say things which you may not want to hear about western men. also when quoting from the quran, make sure the verse is actually there unlike the one you have quoted which is not in the quran. and you consider yourself to be fair and impartial ?!!


Yes, Muslims, compared to non-Muslims, are reproducing FAST , and that is NOT good news because their objective is consensual : they believe that Islam should rule the world and that it is their duty as followers of the Koran and Allah , to promote that dream; to attain that position even if it means ruthless disregard for others, and killing those will not defer to Allah.

again, sheba, this shows your honesty, you have selected a few extremists who tarnish islam and you paint us all with the same brush. if Stalin or MAO committed crimes in the name of atheism, can i say all atheist’s share the same view ? come on think !

If the non-Muslim population were not going down ; shrinking, all this would not bother me so, but most of Europe and the West are having smaller and smaller families. I’ll be perfectly honest with you—this strikes horror in my heart—-especially for the small countries of Europe; they can hold only so many newcomers and then somebody has to suffer. Especially when those newcomers are freeloaders with a lifestyle that clashes miserably with the Democratic system. How much can they take ?


who or more importantly, what has stopped the Europe from not growing? i will tell you some of the reasons and i can elaborate on each specifically if you want me to.. its the idea of not getting pregnant early on as it will ruin a womens career (like an actress), as the “equal opportunity” sets in motion in the minds of women. so they want to get married at a later stage and then sometimes issues arise due to late pregnancy and harder to conceive. also the birth control issue, the gay issue, society breakdown, less people are getting married as dont think its feasible anymore. you want some more, i can give you lots more examples but i dont want to bore the reader.

And you wanted to tell everyone here that the reason Islam was growing so fast was BECAUSE THERE WERE SO MANY CONVERTS ...!! I will admit , though, converts are a problem too.

well for once i can only partially agree with you. why are the converts a problem for you? is it because it weakens your case against islam ? or is there something you not telling me here sheba ?

-

ChaosRules:

I found your diatribe (look it up) very amusing on the issue of the western world having “too many” women. What, we need to maintain a 50/50 ratio for some reason? The gay problem, described by you, the west is experiencing was also enlightening.

i didnt say its wrong to have to many women, i was just stating facts that in general women are more than men, stop trying to twist my words boy !

-

sheba:

Okay Mr. Hawk :


First, let me say this : that I realize that just because a person calls himself/herself a Muslim does not automatically mean that he follows Islam the same as those who are unflappably committed to the Koran . Just as with other religions people adhere to the teachings of their holy doctrines to meet their own tastes or lifestyle. When it comes to Islam, a devout Muslim is supposed to live according to the rules of the Koran and take them very seriously . BUT there are undoubtedly many who call themselves Muslims who live according to their own interpretation of the book. Those kind of Muslims had best live in a country where expectations are not very high, else that person will be judged more severely.

i mostly agree with you on this on.

Where you live I still don’t know, and how much of an “orthodox” ( fundamental; true ) Islamic you are, but how you react to what I say probably has a lot to do with it . Usually, when I talk about Muslim believers, I am talking about those who adhere strictly to the rules and teachings of the Koran .. AND those who have a hostile or competitive attitude towards the non- Muslim world.

i live in the UK. i am a VERY devout muslim. in-fact you probably wont get to debate with a more “orthodox” muslim like me. i strictly follow the rules and teachings to the koran as best as i can. of course i am a human and can make mistakes but i do try to live and die by the teachings of islam. i have no hostility to the western people in general. but i hate the US foreign policy which has terrorised and kill innocent men, women and children and still continue to do so. when i see on the news every day that the US has done this and that to the muslims, what would you expect me to react? what would you do if some countries begins a war on athiests and starts to kill them indiscriminately?

Perhaps in your own private life, you would not dream of hitting your wife, or consider her wrong according to the teachings of Islam if she didn’t want to sleep with you. But there are enough Muslim men who expect a wife to be “obeb ” and respond to him positively or be punished.

well women are there to please the husbands and vice versa. whats wrong with that? if a woman does not wish to sleep with a husband and she has a valid reason, then i can accept that. if she refuses sleep with him just to piss him off, then thats wrong. marriage life is all about caring for one another. not beating each other up. if you cant live with a wife because of continues argument, then islam allows divorce. unlike the westen women, who sell their virginity on the internet for college fees. or how you can sell yourself on the internet for fun ! is this the freedom you crave for? have some self respect ! how low can you get? dont beleive me? check out the link below.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/2971511/Italian-model-plans-to-sell-virginity-for-1m-euros.html


You cannot rightfully say that Islam considers women to be equal to men or that she is free to control her own life , because it just isn’t true. Islam is famous the world over for treating women like second class citizens. That is, according to modern standards . The trouble is, Islam does NOT live by modern standards. You treat women unfairly and hide behind some religious excuse. There just isn’t any argument about that.

treats women like second class citizens? where do you get your sources from? islam teaches to treat women kindly and give them respect. those who treat women like dirt are not then following the true teachings of islam. as i have said many times before, stop judging islam by the people. judge islam by the teachings and you will see the difference.

But I am getting off subject now. I still stand by what I say about Islam and population growth. Women seem to be pregnant every other year- so did Catholic women before they began using birth control. Strict followers of the Koran DO think ( at least the husband does ) that a Muslim wife should not reject her husband’s romantic overtures toward her.

why dont you ask the western women who have converted to islam and see if what you claim is true. for your information, non-muslim women are getting pregnant more or less every year. look at china, india, italy etc…are you telling me they are muslims? anyway, whats wrong with having lots of children if the couple are ok with it? why is that negative ? who, or more importantly what makes you say this is wrong?

Muhammad emphasized that women were possessions of their husbands. THE KORAN :

” IF A HUSBAND CALLS HIS WIFE TO HIS BED ( ie to have sexual relations ) , AND SHE REFUSES HIM AND CAUSES HIM TO SLEEP IN ANGER, THE ANGELS WILL CURSE HER TILL MORNING ” and “

“THE HUSBAND IS ONLY OBLIGED TO SUPPORT HIS WIFE WHEN SHE GIVES HERSELF TO HIM , AND SHE ALLOWS HIM FULL ENJOYMENT OF HER PERSON, AND DOES NOT REFUSE HIM AT ANY TIME OF THE NIGHT OR DAY “

RUBBISH ! THIS IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF YOU BEING SO IGNORANT !!! SHOW ME WHAT YOU HAVE QUOTED ABOVE IS IN THE QURAN? THIS IS A BLATANT LIE. I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROVE IT. you cant and you wont because this is just another attempt of not being bothered in the very least to verify what people tell you. the most disturbing aspect in this; if you cant check up your sources independently and correctly, then what would be the chances if you did find some verse and took the wrong meaning from it? sorry sheba, but this is very disappointing. i have challenged you before when you quoted something and said it was from the quran and you did not get back to me on that. i beleive most of your information is hearsay or from anti-islamic websites. from your other thread, you also dont know much about the islamic history either. you have not quoted me a single verse from the quran, your base you judgement and get your information on hearsay as you have admitted before in the thread, then you have the sheer nerve to say you are fair and objective ?

I’d like to continue but it’s late; very late, so I will “talk” to you again.


well next time you talk to me sheba, please look up the information because you making yourself look so ignorant. sorry to have a go at you sheba. but its so frustrating to talk to somebody when they dont verify the information, go of a whim, and ASSUME this is what islam is. peace.


-

ChaosRules:

OK, so maybe you didn’t say that it was “wrong” to have too many women, but you clearly stated that it is a problem. I don’t think that I was twisting your words at all. If the problem is not that there are too many women, then what is the “female problem” that you allude to in your post? Combined, of course, with the “gay problem”. Again, I don’t believe that there is a requirement for any solution at all.

@ChaosRules…read my post again. look into the context. when i used the word “problem”, i meant that it would be a problem for women to find a husband if every guy got married to one women in the USA. also lots of men are gay which makes it increasingly difficult for a women in the US looking to get married to a man. again, as for being gay, this sick disease of the mind to common in the west due to your curropt beliefs and lifestyle. buts thats a different issue.

Rigamortus:

Wow, could I get you some more bigot sauce for your intolerance platter?
Is this view of homosexuality learned from one of the teachings of love, peace, and harmony in the quran? Or did you come up with it all on your own?

Edit: So you don’t avoid the question by going off on a tangent about how I’m picking on muslims or islam… I’m not. I’m aware that, unfortunately, many people share your same view. But I’m only curious about your reasons right now because, well, you’re who posted the quote above, and you can best speak only about your own reason(s).

very clever at trying to divert the topic. however, i will answer you. being gay is not natural. a plug is made for a socket and vice versa. i mean being gay would be just killing of your species right? you should be anti gay. if everyone was gay, then maybe life as we know it would cease to exist ! so you athiests should be the last people to be pro gay, unless you have become one yourself.

I’ll admit, the gay threat to society, and the human species in general seems insurmountable at present. Hopefully we’ll be able to endure the violence they promote and the rules they impose on the rest of us. It’s hard to resist their recruitment propaganda, but together, god willing, if we hold fast to our plug and socket metaphor, we’ll see our way out of this oppression. Someday.

Sorry for derailing your thread, I just had to ask.

@Rigamortus….you have been a well behaved chimp. in-fact, carry on and you may get invited to audition for the new gorillas in the mist movie. nevertheless, here is your banana for today…..catch !

anyway i am tired of talking to you little monkeys. i want to challenge king kong himself, Sam Harris ! (or richard dawkins). so bring him on, or is he to busy doing another remake of king kong ?


Aaron, Administrator:

The only reason more gay Muslims don’t come out of the closet is because they fear death. Somewhat in the U.S., and predominantly in Scandinavian countries, gay people marry. Healthy societies have integrated gay people seamlessly, with no ill effects.

what a silly person you really are. you just dont know anything do you? you say muslims dont declare thmeselves being gay because of death? well what about muslims living in europe or the USA ? are they afraid of death ? why dont they come out? the reason why they are not gay is because they are not influenced by the curropt and sick society where they live.

100 years ago, being gay in the west was considered bad, as as you guys got more worse, it has become the norm. i bet one day Peadaphiles will be accpeted. you dont know where to stop. your on the path to destruction morally. so go and do some homework first before talking to me this issue.


Do you really believe that this, followed by yet another admonition to “go do your homework,” is really convincing anybody that you know anything? Please stop pretending to know things about which you haven’t a clue.

@Aaron…ok “mr know it all”. tell me, you say sex with children (or under-age sex) is wrong. at what age should it be allowed. i will wait for your answer before i reply.

Deflection.

@aaron…deflection? is that all you can say ? i want you to give me an simple answer to my simple question. how hard can it be? unles you know where i am going with it….

goodgraydrab and W.collins..dont bother replying or asking questions as you are both on ignore due to your blasphemous remarks regarding the holy prophet (S).

chrisssteeven :

Hi,
High birth rates (contraception is forbidden and men can have four wives) and also Islam is spreading through impoverished third world nations who can’t control themselves sexually and do not know anything about birth control.
Islam is also losing members faster than any other religion. 75% of Western converts revert back to their original beliefs within three years of accepting Islam.

can you prove to me ANY of your points above? if not then can you keep that ignorant mouth shut until you back it up with evidence.

-

i meant to say, besides the birth rate factor, which i agreed in my other posts. That is not is dispute. i was refering to the statements where:

1, muslims who cant control themselves sexually

2. Islam losing members faster than any other religion

3. 75% of western converts reverting back to their original beleifs withing 3 years

PROVE TO ME THOSE FACTS MENTIONED ABOVE

GAD:

Lets just cut the shit and answer the question directly.

Q:Why is Islam the fastest growing religion in the world?

A: Because fucking morons are the fastest growing group.

i leave this comment to the viewers who think its only muslims who reply like this person has.


Leaps:

No, Goldenchild. If it had been your reply, it surely would have mentioned bananas.

@Leaps….well that would depend if i was retaliating to an insult. thats whats been going on for the last few weeks. my faith has been insulted so have i. you expect me to remain silent at the torrent of abuse which has been hurled at me ? i am perfectly within my right to give an appropriate response should the occasion arise.

-

how many times do i have to tell you ? can’t you get it through your thick monkey skulls ? i told you that i dont mind you criticising my me or my faith, but insulting is a different thing altogether, you really should know the difference between criticism and insult. i suggest a dictionary may help.

-

this is an article given to me by my friend and i wanted to share this with you lot. i was schocked when i read this. this shows what lengths and to what extent these desperate evolutionists can do do deceive people:

"In 1912, a well-known doctor and amateur paleoanthropologist named Charles Dawson came out with the assertion that he had found a jawbone and a cranial fragment in a pit in Piltdown, England. Even though the jawbone was more ape-like, the teeth and the skull were like a man’s. These specimens were labelled the “Piltdown man.” Alleged to be 500,000 years old, they were displayed as an absolute proof of human evolution in several museums. For more than 40 years, many scientific articles were written on “Piltdown man,” many interpretations and drawings were made, and the fossil was presented as important evidence for human evolution. No fewer than 500 doctoral theses were written on the subject.232 While visiting the British Museum in 1921, leading American paleontologist Henry Fairfield Osborn said “We have to be reminded over and over again that Nature is full of paradoxes” and proclaimed Piltdown “a discovery of transcendant importance to the prehistory of man.“233

In 1949, Kenneth Oakley, from the British Museum’s Paleontology Department, attempted to use “fluorine testing,” a new test used for determining the date of fossils. A trial was made on the fossil of Piltdown man. The result was astonishing. During the test, it was realized that the jawbone of Piltdown man did not contain any fluorine. This indicated that it had remained buried no more than a few years. The skull, which contained only a small amount of fluorine, showed that it was only a few thousand years old.

It was determined that the teeth in the jawbone, belonging to an orangutan, had been worn down artificially and that the “primitive” tools discovered with the fossils were simple imitations that had been sharpened with steel implements. In the detailed analysis completed by Joseph Weiner, this forgery was revealed to the public in 1953. The skull belonged to a 500-year-old man, and the jaw bone belonged to a recently deceased ape! The teeth had been specially arranged in a particular way and added to the jaw, and the molar surfaces were filed in order to resemble those of a man. Then all these pieces were stained with potassium dichromate to give them an old appearance. These stains began to disappear when dipped in acid.

Sir Wilfred Le Gros Clark, who was in the team that uncovered the forgery, could not hide his astonishment at this situation, and said: “The evidences of artificial abrasion immediately sprang to the eye. Indeed so obvious did they seem it may well be asked-how was it that they had escaped notice before?“234 In the wake of all this, “Piltdown man” was hurriedly removed from the British Museum where it had been displayed for more than 40 years"

-
Dennis Campbell:
GH,
Excellent example. Thanks for posting it. It demonstrates that science seek to correct itself using skepticism and objective verification of claims. Of course there are people who misrepresent, who lie and who seek to claim something in order to advance their own interests, in science as well as religion. The above cited example is something that can be, and was, shown to be false. If religious claims could be so easily verified, we’d have fewer disagreements.
Dennis

@dennis…of course religion can be easily verified. who says it can’t. islam is a very open religion and its laws and practices are open for discussions. just give me ONE example where you have evidence of an islamic issue which cannot be discussed. i look forward to your reply.
Skipshot:
Ladies and gentlemen, regarding our new member representing Islam we should let Sheba handle the topic. She claims to have all the answers in why Islam is evil. It’s strange she hasn’t chimed in on this thread.
Dennis Campbell:

Have been hoping Sheba would join this thread. If so, maybe we could get movie rights?
Otherwise, GH continues to be the most “convincing” advocate of Islam we’ve had here that I’ve seen.
Dennis
its clear you cant refute any of my arguments on islam, therefore i think we should talk about evolution theory or atheist morals. you may have a slight chance with those topics.

goldenhawk786 wins after W. Collins and Dennis Campbell throw in the towel in their post 261 on page 18, dated 14 March 2010 08:02 AM.
Reason given: Atheist opponents fled the battlefield.
Well done.
----

Hawk Untrapped

-

Bruce v. GH—ding ding ding ding ding

Posted by nonverbal -
15 February 2010 09:26 AM


In this thread, I’m inviting Bruce and GH to discuss their own and each other’s theistic ways. Ideally, each will be frank with the other and tell a closely held secret or two in a loosely veiled attempt to convince the opponent of the folly of his chosen (?) branch of theism. As Dennis alluded to in a neighboring thread this morning, frank discussion between unusually devout religious people, as it’s quietly being watched by atheists, might be a learning experience for all.
I’m not requesting any more moderation of this thread than any other. I am, however—in the spirit of samharris.org precedence—requesting that only Bruce and GH enter posts until they decide to open up discussion to all. I will not post again in this thread, and will entirely understand and accept someone disagreeing with my intent and interrupting Bruce and GH. But I hope you’ll, in turn, understand my intent here, which is serious and perhaps a little bit experimental.

-

Bruce Burleson:


OK nonverbal, I’ll accept your invitation. The first point that I would like to make to GH is that for believers, once you accept that God exists and that Jesus was historical, there is simply no need for an additional prophet like Muhammad. There’s no need to say anything negative about Muhammad himself - he may have been the most sincere person alive. However, if I have the teachings of Jesus, why do I need anything else? Jesus teaches me to have faith, to be righteous, to love others, to do good, to help the needy, etc. If I can’t do that based on his teachings, I’m not sure what good another prophet will do me.
My point is simply that, given Christianity, why Islam?

goldenhawk786:

nice try, but i am not going to fall for it. me and bruce started a thread about Christianity and Islam. it was going all fine until you atheists started joining in and coming ot with your usual rubbish wrapped up with nice words like dennis does. therefore i am not going to engage here with bruce as you suggest as it will be hijacked again. i want to talk about athiesm and evolution and the many flaws it has. bruce if your reading this, don’t bother, they wont leave us alone.


eudemonia:

Muslim coward.


goldenhawk786:

another monkey cage being rattled here. was eudemonia given to you by the zoo keeper or someone else? do you have a name or just a serial number ? i am really interested.
i have post this note on another thread but in case you infidels have missed it, i will copy and paste my comment. you calling me a coward ? get down from your tree and i will show you that your your hero sam harris is the coward. i was just watching him give a lecture on youtube. although he is an idiot and thinks he knows about islam, he is just a grunt like the rest of you apes. he said you guys should not call yourselves atheist. i think he must be ashamed of himself giving that label. its like asking a homosexual, not to call yourself gay. why not ? you atheists should be proud of it. i know his reason why he does not want to be called an atheist or to be labeled as one, but that’s for you guys to figure out. check it out.


So easy to rattle Goldenflow. All you have to do is call him a coward.
Same old monkey rhetoric? What are you 11 years old? Or are you just married to an 11 year old?

what difference would that make to you if i was 11 or older as you can only count to ten. i don’t want to confuse you or others chimps unnecessary. you may not perform well at the next circus.


Dennis Campbell :

How does Islamic Law address the practice, reported perhaps by biased Jewish media, on what they call “honor killings” of women who have engaged in sexual contact with those not of the true faith?

Dennis

-

well that depends on lots of things dennis. you need to give me a proper scenario so i can give you an answer. that statement is like saying what if someone steals? well lots of details would be required and would depend on the circumstances before punishment (if necessary) could be administered. e.g. was the thief poor or rich? if he was rich and stole when he did not need to, then he will be punished. but if he was poor and was looking for food to feed himself or his family, then that would be taken into consideration. islam is a reasonable and fair religion, despite what you guys think.



Dennis Campbell :

A man or his sons kill a daughter who they suspect of having had sexual desires or contact with a man of whom they do not approve. That has been reported to occur as many as 5,000 times a year the World Health Organization worldwide, but almost always among Muslim people.
How does Islamic Law address these reported practices?

Dennis

first of all, there is no punishment based on suspicion. islam has the perfect justice system. it requires witnesses and evidence. Islam, therefore, discourages unwarranted suspicions as much as possible. in my view these honour killings based on suspicion are absolutely appalling and a disgrace. in the holy quran, Allah says:
O you who have believed, avoid much [negative] assumption. Indeed, some assumption is sin. And do not spy or backbite each other. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his brother when dead? You would detest it. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Accepting of repentance and Merciful. (Qur’an 49:12)
So, if a wicked person accuses a woman or a man of adultery or fornication, she or he should be given the benefit of the doubt. Allah warns the believers against the mischief of the wicked. allah says in the holy quran:
O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful.(Qur’an 49:6)
so what does Islam say about honor killings? does Islam really have a concept of honor killings? since most of the victims here are females; so does Islam really order to kill females in the name of honor?
focusing more on your question, Ahmad Kutty, a senior lecturer at the Islamic Institute of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, states (i took a partial quote from his lecture):
“There is no such concept in Islam that is called “honor killing”. Islam holds every soul in high esteem and does not allow any transgression upon it. It does not allow people to take the law in their own hands and administer justice, because doing so will be leading to chaos and lawlessness. Therefore, based on this, Islam does not permit such killings. First of all, in order to sanction killing, it must be through a binding verdict issued by an authoritative law court. Individuals themselves have no authority either to judge cases or pass judgments. Therefore, a Muslim should not sanction such killing because doing so will be leading to the rule of the law of the jungle. A civilized society cannot be run by such laws.”
shedding more light on this subject, `Atiyyah Saqr, former head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, states:
“Like all other religions, Islam strictly prohibits murder and killing without legal justification. Allah, Most High, says in the holy quran, “But whoever kills a believer intentionally - his recompense is Hell, wherein he will abide eternally, and Allah has become angry with him and has cursed him and has prepared for him a great punishment.” (An-Nisa’: 93)
The so-called “honor killing” is based on ignorance and disregard of morals and laws, which cannot be abolished except by disciplinary punishments. It goes without saying that people are not entitled to take the law in their own hands, for it’s the responsibility of the Muslim State and its concerned bodies to maintain peace, security, etc., and to prevent chaos and disorder from creeping into the Muslim society.”
so this has nothing to do with islam. this is more backward culture which seriously needs to be addressed. please dont confuse culture with islam. these people who say they are acting in the name of religion may misunderstand their religion or practice it wrongly. for this reason, it is a mistake to form any idea of that religion from the activities of these people. so the best way to understand Islam is through its holy source. these people who use religion to justify these actions are not true believers, know nothing about islam, most likely have never read the quran in their lives. they fall into the same category as the KKK who claim to be christians, yet kill black people, or stalin being influenced with marxism and carrying out his agenda.
however, adultery and fornication, which is so rife in the west, is condemned in islam. IF these evil, shameful and other promiscuous sex practices are PROVEN to have been commited by the person, then they will be punished according to the islamic law, because they are indeed serious crimes which affect the entire society. Islamic law explicitly prohibits adultery and fornication as clearly mentioned in the following verse from the Holy Quran::
“Nor come nigh to adultery: for it is a shameful (deed) and an evil, opening the road (to other evils).” (Qur’an, 17:32)
just drifting of the subject slightly, i would like to make this point. in islam, a woman has the right to choose on whom she wants to marry. it is highly recommended to seek advice from her parents and family members on who she wants to marry. the final choice is hers. but the best quality to look for to get married is to check if the person is pious. piety will add peace and harmony to the couple and will prevent social breakdown in society. athiesm has no answer for this but thats for another topic regarding anti-social behavior and society breakdown in the west.
also i want you guys to know that in Islam, the wife is equally granted the right to divorce her husband if her demand for divorce is justifiable. that’s if the marriage does not prove to be functional and effective because the husband neglects his responsibilities or no element of love binds them to stay together. By the same token, if the wife is guilty of open lewdness, the husband may resort to divorce. divroce is not reccomended in islam, but it is there to be used as a last resort. may allah forgive me if i have made any mistakes in my response as allah knows best.
hope i have given a comprehensive reply. i will try to reply to you guys as long as you ask nicely like dennis. ahem, ahem. LOL



Dennis Campbell:

Again thank you for your most revealing above post, as it goes far to helping us understand you and your views.
Dennis

your welcome dennis. you are one of the few whom i enjoy having a conversation with, unlike the other un-believers. it’s always a pleasure reading your posts and answering any questions you may have regarding islam. peace.


Jefe :

goldenhawk786, you said: "i want to talk about evolution and the many flaws it has."

Name one. Lets talk about it.

@Jefe..these are some of the flaws of evolution. of course i cant understand everything as i am not a scientist. my friends father is a micro-biologist. although he is not a muslim or christian, he rejects evolution and believes in some sort of intelligent design. i sit down with him from time to time and he has me convinced about this fake theory which most of guys believe. what i have posted (taken from a website) below is some of his thoughts which i agree with. i want to hear some counter-arguments so i can take them back to him.


"1. The complexity of living systems could never evolve by chance—they had to be designed and created.A system that is irreducibly complex has precise components working together to perform the basic function of the system. (A mousetrap is a simple example.) If any part of that system were missing, the system would cease to function. Gradual additions could not account for the origin of such a system. It would have to come together fully formed and integrated. Many living systems exhibit this (vision, blood-clotting, etc.). When you look at a watch, you assume there was a watchmaker. A watch is too complex to “happen” by chance. Yet such living systems are almost infinitely more complex than a watch. They could not be random—they simply had to be designed and created.

2. The high information content of DNA could only have come from intelligence.Information science teaches that in all known cases, complex information requires an intelligent message sender. This is at the core of the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI). DNA is by far the most compact information storage/retrieval system known. A pinhead of DNA has a billion times more information capacity than a 4-gigabit hard drive. Ironically, evolutionists scan the heavens using massive radio telescopes hoping for relatively simple signal patterns that might have originated in outer space, all the while ignoring the incredibly complex evidence of superior intelligence built into every human’s DNA. While we’re waiting to hear signs of intelligence behind interstellar communication, we’re ignoring those built into us.

3. No mutation that increases genetic information has ever been discovered.Mutations which increase genetic information would be the raw material necessary for evolution. To get from “amoeba” to “man” would require a massive net increase in information. There are many examples of supposed evolution given by proponents. Variation within a species (finch beak, for example), bacteria which acquire antibiotic resistance, people born with an extra chromosome, etc. However, none of the examples demonstrate the development of new information. Instead, they demonstrate either preprogrammed variation, multiple copies of existing information, or even loss of information (natural selection and adaptation involve loss of information). The total lack of any such evidence refutes evolutionary theory.

4. Evolution flies directly in the face of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics.This law of physics states that all systems, whether open or closed, have a tendency to disorder (or “the least energetic state”). There are some special cases where local order can increase, but this is at the expense of greater disorder elsewhere. Raw energy cannot generate the complex systems in living things, or the information required to build them. Undirected energy just speeds up destruction. Yet, evolution is a building-up process, suggesting that things tend to become more complex and advanced over time. This is directly opposed to the law of entropy.

5. There is a total lack of undisputed examples (fossilized or living) of the millions of transitional forms (“missing links”) required for evolution to be true.Evolution does not require a single missing link, but innumerable ones. We should be surrounded by a zoo of transitional forms that cannot be categorized as one particular life form. But we don’t see this—there are different kinds of dogs, but all are clearly dogs. The fossils show different sizes of horses, but all are clearly horses. None is on the verge of being some other life form. The fossil record shows complex fossilized life suddenly appearing, and there are major gaps between the fossilized “kinds.” Darwin acknowledged that if his theory were true, it would require millions of transitional forms. He believed they would be found in fossil records. They haven’t been.

6. Pictures of ape-to-human “missing links” are extremely subjective and based on evolutionists’ already-formed assumptions. Often they are simply contrived.The series of pictures or models that show progressive development from a little monkey to modern man are an insult to scientific research. These are often based on fragmentary remains that can be “reconstructed” a hundred different ways. The fact is, many supposed “ape-men” are very clearly apes. Evolutionists now admit that other so-called “ape-men” would be able to have children by modern humans, which makes them the same species as humans. The main species said to bridge this gap, Homo habilis, is thought by many to be a mixture of ape and human fossils. In other words, the “missing link” (in reality there would have to be millions of them) is still missing. The body hair and the blank expressions of sub-humans in these models doesn’t come from the bones, but the assumptions of the artist. Virtually nothing can be determined about hair and the look in someone’s eyes based on a few old bones.

7. The dating methods that evolutionists rely upon to assign millions and billions of years to rocks are very inconsistent and based on unproven (and questionable) assumptions.Dating methods that use radioactive decay to determine age assume that radioactive decay rates have always been constant. Yet, research has shown that decay rates can change according to the chemical environment of the material being tested. In fact, decay rates have been increased in the laboratory by a factor of a billion. All such dating methods also assume a closed system—that no isotopes were gained or lost by the rock since it formed. It’s common knowledge that hydrothermal waters, at temperatures of only a few hundred degrees Centigrade, can create an open system where chemicals move easily from one rock system to another. In fact, this process is one of the excuses used by evolutionists to reject dates that don’t fit their expectations. What’s not commonly known is that the majority of dates are not even consistent for the same rock. Furthermore, 20th century lava flows often register dates in the millions to billions of years. There are many different ways of dating the earth, and many of them point to an earth much too young for evolution to have had a chance. All age-dating methods rely on unprovable assumptions.

8. Uses continue to be found for supposedly “leftover” body structures.Evolutionists point to useless and vestigial (leftover) body structures as evidence of evolution. However, it’s impossible to prove that an organ is useless, because there’s always the possibility that a use may be discovered in the future. That’s been the case for over 100 supposedly useless organs which are now known to be essential. Scientists continue to discover uses for such organs. It’s worth noting that even if an organ were no longer needed (e.g., eyes of blind creatures in caves), it would prove devolution not evolution. The evolutionary hypothesis needs to find examples of developing organs—those that are increasing in complexity.

9. Evolution is said to have begun by spontaneous generation—a concept ridiculed by biology.When I was a sophomore in high school, and a brand new Christian, my biology class spent the first semester discussing how ignorant people used to believe that garbage gave rise to rats, and raw meat produced maggots. This now disproven concept was called “spontaneous generation.” Louis Pasteur proved that life only comes from life—this is the law of biogenesis. The next semester we studied evolution, where we learned that the first living cell came from a freak combination of nonliving material (where that nonliving material came from we were not told). “Chemical Evolution” is just another way of saying “spontaneous generation”—life comes from nonlife. Evolution is therefore built on a fallacy science long ago proved to be impossible.
Evolutionists admit that the chances of evolutionary progress are extremely low. Yet, they believe that given enough time, the apparently impossible becomes possible. If I flip a coin, I have a 50/50 chance of getting heads. To get five “heads” in a row is unlikely but possible. If I flipped the coin long enough, I would eventually get five in a row. If I flipped it for years nonstop, I might get 50 or even 100 in a row. But this is only because getting heads is an inherent possibility. What are the chances of me flipping a coin, and then seeing it sprout arms and legs, and go sit in a corner and read a magazine? No chance. Given billions of years, the chances would never increase. Great periods of time make the possible likely but never make the impossible possible. No matter how long it’s given, non-life will not become alive.

10. The scientific method can only test existing data—it cannot draw conclusions about origins.Micro-evolution, changes within a species on a small scale, is observable. But evidence for macro-evolution, changes transcending species, is conspicuous by its absence. To prove the possibility of anything, science must be able to reproduce exact original conditions. Even when it proves something is possible, it doesn’t mean it therefore happened. Since no man was there to record or even witness the beginning, conclusions must be made only on the basis of interpreting presently available information. If I put on rose-colored glasses, I will always see red. I accept the Bible’s teaching on creation, and see the evidence as being consistently supportive of that belief. When dealing with origins, everyone who believes anything does so by faith, whether faith in God, the Bible, himself, modern science, or the dependability of his own subjective interpretations of existing data. I would rather put my faith in God’s revealed Word."

i am going to be busy for the next few days, so keep your questions regarding islam ready for me when i return, and stop watching jewish news channls like fox news. maybe your monkey brains will “evolve” slightly or maybe its just wishful thinking.

GAD:

Your in for it now, Jefe! It’s the old top ten list of why morons can’t understand evolution.

@GAD...the only moron around here is you. i will make you a deal. you can shout and swing all you want up in the trees, but when you get down, i will shoot you with a tranquilizer and ship you over to the far east so they can eat fresh monkey brains. well maybe in your case, they will be disappointed and they may ask for a refund as they wont find any brains in that thick monkey skull of yours !

-


first of all, before you start accusing me of insulting again, i was responding to GAD’s insult. therefore it would help, if you look at his posts BEFORE judging me. i am trying to engage in a civil debate, but i feel that hardly any thread goes beyond 50 posts before someone insults me first, therefore i am within my right to retaliate in a appropriate manner. secondly i have acknowledged that my understanding is limited regarding evolution compared to scientists. my friends father is a micro biologist (a non-muslim), who hold discussions with me about islam. he does not like islam, and we have held many meeting about my faith. but he is a highly respected scientist in his field and i am sure he is more knowledgeable that most of you guys.
he rejects evolution based on facts and has debated many other scientists about this theory. therefore he is in a better position to talk to me about this theory than you guys. unless you guys tell me, he is a bad scientist. i mean if evolution was a fact like you are making it out to be, then why are not scientists united on this issue? are those scientists who reject evolution bad or crazy scientists according to you guys ? are those who do not fall in line with your “path”, not scientists? at least he is more reasonable that richard dawkins. when he was asked how life was started, he said its possible that aliens came and planted life on this planet. this shows his prejudice, that he will go to any length not to believe in god but would rather believe in aliens, when he has not provided a shred of evidence to back up this ridiculous theory. watch what he says on youtube


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8

i am asking you guys, can anyone explain how the first cell was created ? charles darwin thought that life came through chance. he thought the first cell was very basic and primitive and it evolved from there. if he only knew about what biologists know now, through the technology we have now that the cell is very complicated mechanism. its requires all elements within the cell to function properly at the same time otherwise it wont work.
i will give you one example, for the cell to function properly, it requires protein and in turn, the protein would require other elements in the cell fully working at the same time. it would be IMPOSSIBLE for all the elements to come by chance. thats like saying, if there was a junk yard and big gust of wind or a tornado came to this junk yard, it would somehow assemble all the parts and make a airplane. doesn’t this sound absurd to you? another example, to put it simply, if you had a mouse trap and for it to function properly, it will require ALL the mechanisms to fully function. any one missing would simply make it useless. this is what my friends father has told me and has me convinced about the flaws of your evolution theory. i look forward to your responses.


-

johnnyb1999:

GAD wrote: "Your in for it now, Jefe! It’s the old top ten list of why morons can’t understand evolution."

Is this the quote you are referring to, GH? I can’t see any insults directly aimed at you within that post. Does GAD refer to you personally? No. When I made my previous posts, I actually read through the rest of this topic to see if there was any insults aimed at you, and apart from the comment made by Eud, which I have already covered, I could find none up until the point you started with the monkey crap.

Also, you said in your last post….. "i am trying to engage in a civil debate, but i feel that hardly any thread goes beyond 50 posts before someone insults me first, therefore i am within my right to retaliate in a appropriate manner. "

Firstly, your idea of civil debate obviously include use of the term ‘monkey’, and liberal insults at the Jews and atheists. That’s not most peoples idea of civil debate. Also, your above statement suggests to me a certain playground mentality. “...he called me names so I called him names, neh neh ne neh neh”.

@johnnyb1999…i will not call anyone monkey if they don’t provoke me. i don’t see you condemning their actions against me. i know your in their gang, but surely you can try to remain reasonable and impartial without upsetting them by speaking the truth. i am the victim here !


eudemonia :

Man your claims are really old and outdated. You have a lot of research to do.
Creationist claim 010.2 cells were too complex to have come together by chance.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB010_2.html

i have read that website. if you bother to read that carefully, that’s talking about genetic mutations, not the origin of the first cell. it does not say the first cell was created by a genetic mutation. its only talks talks about once complex life HAS been formed. darwin did not talk about genetic mutations. this is a new theory once it was proven wrong by scientists that life could not have evolved in stages as suggested by darwin. also, as for genetic mutation, i have not seen ONE example where the genome information was actually increased by genetic mutation. even richard dawkins has conceded to this fact. on the contrary, evidence has shown that these mutations have been detrimental but you guys just don’t WANT to believe, despite the evidence.

Goldenhawk you need to read real evolutionary biology and forget the religious propaganda stuff by creation scientists and Intelligent design theorists.

oh so your saying that these creationist scientists are not real or are bad scientists? the only real scientists for you are the ones that believe in evolution? your reasoning here is pathetic. i cant believe you dismiss those scientists who believe in intelligent design (even dawkins suggested that as a possibility), simply because they don’t fall in line with your belief and have an alternative answer to yours.

-

Another fact (pay attenton bruce) which refutes evolution according to scientists (including my friend’s father):


"Trilobites vs. Darwin - One of the most interesting of the many different species that suddenly emerged in the Cambrian Age is the now-extinct trilobites. Trilobites belonged to the Arthropoda phylum, and were very complicated creatures with hard shells, articulated bodies, and complex organs. The fossil record has made it possible to carry out very detailed studies of trilobites’ eyes. The trilobite eye is made up of hundreds of tiny facets, and each one of these contains two lens layers. This eye structure is a real wonder of design. David Raup, a professor of geology at Harvard, Rochester, and Chicago Universities, says, “the trilobites 450 million years ago used an optimal design which would require a well trained and imaginative optical engineer to develop today.”
The extraordinarily complex structure even in trilobites is enough to invalidate Darwinism on its own, because no complex creatures with similar structures lived in previous geological periods, which goes to show that trilobites emerged with no evolutionary process behind them. A 2001 Science article says:
Cladistic analyses of arthropod phylogeny revealed that trilobites, like eucrustaceans, are fairly advanced “twigs” on the arthropod tree. But fossils of these alleged ancestral arthropods are lacking. ...Even if evidence for an earlier origin is discovered, it remains a challenge to explain why so many animals should have increased in size and acquired shells within so short a time at the base of the Cambrian
Very little was known about this extraordinary situation in the Cambrian Age when Charles Darwin was writing The Origin of Species. Only since Darwin’s time has the fossil record revealed that life suddenly emerged in the Cambrian Age, and that trilobites and other invertebrates came into being all at once. For this reason, Darwin was unable to treat the subject fully in the book. But he did touch on the subject under the heading “On the sudden appearance of groups of allied species in the lowest known fossiliferous strata,” where he wrote the following about the Silurian Age (a name which at that time encompassed what we now call the Cambrian):
“For instance, I cannot doubt that all the Silurian trilobites have descended from some one crustacean, which must have lived long before the Silurian age, and which probably differed greatly from any known animal… Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”
Darwin said “If my theory be true, [the Cambrian] Age must have been full of living creatures.” As for the question of why there were no fossils of these creatures, he tried to supply an answer throughout his book, using the excuse that “the fossil record is very lacking.” But nowadays the fossil record is quite complete, and it clearly reveals that creatures from the Cambrian Age did not have ancestors. This means that we have to reject that sentence of Darwin’s which begins “If my theory be true.” Darwin’s hypotheses were invalid, and for that reason, his theory is mistaken.
The record from the Cambrian Age demolishes Darwinism, both with the complex bodies of trilobites, and with the emergence of very different living bodies at the same time. Darwin wrote “If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of descent with slow modification through natural selection.” that is, the theory at the heart of in his book. But as we saw earlier, some 60 different animal phyla started into life in the Cambrian Age, all together and at the same time, let alone small categories such as species. This proves that the picture which Darwin had described as “fatal to the theory” is in fact the case. This is why the Swiss evolutionary paleoanthropologist Stefan Bengtson, who confesses the lack of transitional links while describing the Cambrian Age, makes the following comment: “Baffling (and embarrassing) to Darwin, this event still dazzles us.”
Another matter that needs to be dealt with regarding trilobites is that the 530-million-year-old compound structure in these creatures’ eyes has come down to the present day completely unchanged. Some insects today, such as bees and dragonflies, possess exactly the same eye structure. This discovery deals yet another “fatal blow” to the theory of evolution’s claim that living things develop from the primitive to the complex."

-


Dennis Campbell :

GH,

While you are attending to my efforts to seek enlightenment from your superior knowledge of Islamic law, would you honor me by responding to some of the questions I posed earlier? These are in part:

1. What country or countries best exemplifies your view of the application of Islamic law?

the closest islam country for me would be iran. although not perfect at the moment, but it’s getting there.

2. In a hypothetical country ruled by Islamic law, how are consenting adults who engage sexual relations with other consenting adults in private treated by Islamic Laws?

i take it, you are talking about adultery or fornication? if yes, then islam only punishes on evidence and facts. if they remain to engage in such evil and immoral acts while getting away with it, then they will be punished in the hereafter. if they are caught in the act, the the correct punishment will be administered by the muslim judge.

3. Is it just as acceptable for a woman to run for election to a public office and to potentially lead the country as it is a man?

woman can never be in charge of a country. that does not mean she is worthless, but women cant make decisions under pressure. they let their emotions sometimes ruin their judgement, therefore the risks would be to high for the people and would eventually be detrimental to them. this has been proven.

4. In a country ruled by Islamic law, how are the leaders of that country selected?

depends what you mean by leader. lets take iran for example, president ahmadinejad runs the country, but ayatollahs have the final say especially when it comes to islam rulings and laws as they are the experts in that field.

5. If you are a citizen of a secular country, like the UK, do you consider that secular law prevails when it is conflict with Islamic Law?

man made laws can never prevail over god made laws. if that did, then it would imply imperfection in the knowledge of the almighty allah, which is impossible.

6. How does Islamic Law deal with men who kill their daughters or sisters by “honor killing?”

as i have mentioned before, honor killings have no place in islam. that’s more culture than religion. secondly, if an honor killing did take place and it was proven, then it would be up-to the muslim judge to hold accountable those responsible for this act.

I again thank you in advance for being so kind and patient in responding to the simple questions I ask you. I clearly have a great deal to learn and so far you’ve been very accommodating in responding here on this forum for all to see. If you do not respond to these questions, then those here reading will of course assume that they are poor questions, and never that you’re unable to do so.

Dennis

its always a pleasure responding to you as long as people as nicely. why cant they take a lesson from you on how to ask questions in a pleasant well mannered way ? surely its not that hard is it? remember, i am not an scholar or an expert on islam, these are my views. anyway hope i have answered your questions.

-


Bruce Burleson :

["Iran"?]
This is perhaps the scariest answer that you could have given. If there is one country that is more likely to plunge the world into a religious war, it is Iran.

wrong! it’s the US and israel that is HAS and IS creating wars, then always play the victim card and people like you are falling for it. dont you remember george bush saying that “God” told him to invade Iraq. israel has created and religious state with the sole purpose of taking more land from muslims in the pretext for religious justification.

It’s leaders have vowed to wipe Israel off the map. Regardless of whether you approve of or reject the very existence of Israel, surely you understand that such threats are very likely to lead to a conflagration.

well what about the threats (made year after year) by the US government to iran? have you ever thought about that ?you look at the total threats and weigh them up, you will discover that the scale would be a lot heavier in the USA scale.

Iran makes its threats, then completely disregards the opinion of the world community, and proceeds with testing ballistic missiles and enriching uranium. No one believes the Iranian leaders because they appear to scoff at the idea of international law. And all of it is unnecessary. Israel would present no threat to Iran if Iran did not make its threats. If that is the world that you present as being ideal, it is a world filled with violence, death and destruction.

this statement is disappointing coming from you bruce. the opinion of the world is FOR iran, in its god given right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. the leaders have said this so many times, but it’s falling on deaf ears with you guys. it’s only the US and their allies who is spreading this propaganda that the world is against iran. iran can proceed with testing weapons. it has EVERY right to conduct and test weapons. also are you telling me, israel and the US dont test weapons? in-fact israel and the US HAVE nuclear weapons, THEY HAVE invaded countries, THEY HAVE used illegal weapons, THEY HAVE occupied land illegally.
you want me to carry on? the threat is COMING from israel and the USA who are bullying muslims countries all the time, and you dare to spin and place the blame on iran? i need a whole new thread to inform you about the crimes of the US and israel. i cant believe you look at iran as a threat while ignoring all these facts. it is hard as the jewish lobby in the US is very powerful and has a huge influence on the media. however, i urge you to wake up from this vicious and continuous propaganda being injected into your veins. i have never seen so much brainwashed people. the worst is, this is coming from people with “reason”.

[ pause]


HI everyone. did you guys miss me ? i suppose not, because to your rebellious nature of rejecting God. however, do no lose all hope as i am here and will try to open up your infidel hearts and minds. anyway, i am not available most of the time, like i was before due to work and family commitments, but that does not mean i will be nice to you. i will still remain a hard core muslim and will not try to hide my faith, unlike your hero (sam harris).
anyway dennis, i have read your long post, its a lot to take in and will take time to understand and digest it. as for someone here called burt, what on earth are you talking about? you say i am not replying to you anymore? i cant remember what you have said. i am not trying to ignore you. it maybe a slip of the mind but it was unintentional due to answering all these atheist un-beleivers. so dont bitch or moan and tell me whats your question?
as for the christian guy called bruce, i dont know why we had a conversation here in this thread, lets go back to the islam threads and talk over there, as long as you leave your banana’s here (if you know what i mean). as for the rest of you evolution theory believing idiots, lets take it to the other thread. the title of this thread and its purpose is over. lets talk about islam vs secularism or god vs evolution. i am happy to talk to you about any of these two topics, but i will feel i can reply on islam better as i have more knowledge on that subject, but i can still talk about evolution also.

burt:

You are obviously trolling for a fight but I won’t give it to you. I have been respectful of your beliefs, and have put our several invitations for you to consider but you haven’t seen them, or have not responded if you did (presumably you are not sufficiently educated in the subtleties to actually have picked these up), so there is no reason to converse with you at this point in time, I have better ways to occupy myself. As-Saalam Aleikum

i am not trying to pick a fight with you. i don’t initiate fights with anyone except in self defence which is my god given right. you dont wanna talk to me, then fine, but dont come out with that kind of rubbish excuse. or is it another way to run away from a debate? like i said before and i have made it clear, that if i miss your posts, then remind me as i am in different threads and forums dealing with these atheists / infidels. i dont think i have debated with you due to the fact of these anti-god devils always derailing threads when i am winning arguments. they will dwell in the hell fire if they dont change their rebellious ways. so if you want to talk then let me know, otherwise salam back to you.


[ continues.... 6 ]

-